One of the arguments for aluminum bats is that they cost less to own, primarily because they don't break. But what about environmental costs? I wonder which bat-making process has a lower carbon footprint? Might make an interesting sidebar to the controversy.
- Coburn, Davin. "Baseball Physics: Anatomy of a Home Run." Popular Mechanics. Dec. 18, 2009. (July 7, 2012) http://www.popularmechanics.com/outdoors/sports/physics/4216783?click=main_sr
- Nathan, Allan, Daniel A. Russell and Lloyd V. Smith. "The Physics of the Trampoline Effect in Baseball and Softball Bats." Engineering of Sport 5. International Sports Engineering Association, 2004. (July 7, 2012) http://webusers.npl.illinois.edu/~a-nathan/pob/trampoline-v6.pdf
- Nathan, Alan. "Wood versus Aluminum Bats." The Physics of Baseball. University of Illinois. April 16, 2007. (July 7, 2012) http://webusers.npl.illinois.edu/~a-nathan/pob/al-vs-wood.pdf
- Russell, Daniel A. "Aluminum and Composite Bats: Performance Standards in College Baseball." Physics and Acoustics of Baseball and Softball Bats. Penn State University. (July 7, 2012) http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/bats/NCAA-stats.html
- Russell, D.A. "Hoop frequency as a predictor of performance for softball bats." Engineering of Sport 5. International Sports Engineering Association, 2004. (July 7, 2012) http://www.acs.psu.edu/drussell/bats/Papers/Russell_HoopFreq-ISEA2004.pdf